District college notes: St. Vincent's Poole again honored as Runner of the Week
St. Vincent senior Chansler Poole won his fourth Presidents' Athletic Conference Runner of the Week honor for placing sixth at the Inter-Regional Rumble at Oberlin College in Ohio.
Poole finished the 8K course in 25 minutes, 30.29 seconds. St. Vincent finished 10th overall.
St. Vincent stays hot
The St. Vincent women's soccer team improved to 9-6-1 overall, 4-2-1 in the Presidents' Athletic Conference with its third consecutive 1-0 victory.
The Bearcats defeated Bethany on a goal by Meghan Smith. Cassie Overly (Hempfield/Greensburg) was the goalkeeper. SVC has also defeated Thiel and Geneva during the current streak.
Lingafelt leads St. Vincent golfers
Derek Lingafelt tied for the overall championship, and he helped the St. Vincent men's golf team to a 16-shot win over Washington & Jefferson at the Presidents' Athletic Conference Fall Invitational at Oak Tree Country Club. Lingafelt finished with 144.
Pletcher, Zavatsky win
Latrobe wrestlers Luke Pletcher and Zack Zavatsky captured belts at the annual Super 32 preseason wrestling tournament in Greensboro, N.C., on Sunday.
Pletcher, a sophomore and returning WPIAL and PIAA Class AAA 106-pound champion, won the 120-pound title by pinning Derry sophomore and PIAA Class AA 113-pound champion George Phillippi.
Zavatsky, a senior who will wrestle at Virginia Tech, won the 182-pound title. He defeated Nicky Hall of New York, 5-2.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.