WCCC women look to repeat as conference champions
College Football Videos
Westmoreland County Community College women's basketball coach Scott Hillen has been with the program since it began in 2007.
The team is coming off its best year in the previous seven seasons, finishing 23-5 and winning its second consecutive Western Pennsylvania Collegiate Conference title.
That's the good news. Now the bad.
WCCC returns only one starter, all-American Danielle Murphy, and top reserve Christina Brletich. So Hillen has his hands full trying to replace his frontcourt. Murphy averaged 17.5 points per game, while Brletich was a role player.
Gone are forwards Hannah Falcsik, Lauren Gross and Kerri Zelenak. Point guard Jasmine Belt also left to concentrate on academics. Falcsik averaged 14.1 points per game.
“Developing an inside game is important,” Hillen said. “Freshmen Devin Larkin (Greensburg Central Catholic) and Kristina Wagner (California) will play important roles on the inside, while Mariah Ward (Monessen) and Alyssa Smith (Blairsville) are the top point guard candidates.
“We're going to be young and inexperienced on the college level. The biggest thing is getting the players to jell and play together as a team. Most of the players are freshmen.”
One pleasant surprise to the squad is Shalia Williams, who transferred to WCCC from a school in San Marcos, Calif. Williams, a 5-foot-9 forward, averaged 7.9 points per game at Palomar College.
“She's going to help,” Hillen said. “We're excited to see how well she plays for us. She could be really good.”
Last year's squad finished with only eight players. Hillen said there are currently 10 on the roster.
“I'd like to have more depth,” Hillen said. “But I'm happy with the squad.”
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- College football notebook: Date moved up for Pitt-Penn State game
- Former California teammates may soon be college rivals