The St. Vincent College men's cross country team captured its fourth consecutive Presidents' Athletic Conference championship Saturday at Chatham University. The Bearcats finished with 30 points, followed by Grove City with 59 and Waynesburg 93.
Senior Chansler Poole (Penn-Trafford), who finished second in 2012, won the individual title in a time of 25 minutes, 15 seconds. He was 24 seconds ahead of Grove City's Arleigh McRae.
Andrew Razanauskas finished fourth and Eric Porter (Mt. Pleasant) was seventh. The trio earned All-PAC first-team honors.
Earning second-team honors were Sawyer Palonder (eighth), Vincent Tonzo (10th), Brandon Holmes (11th) and Brandon Moretton (12th).
Andy Herr was named PAC Coach of the Year.
SVC women finish third
The St. Vincent College women's cross country team placed third at the Presidents' Athletic Conference championship Saturday at Chatham University.
Grove City won with 33 points, followed by Waynesburg with 75 and St. Vincent 89.
Genie Fratto (Latrobe) and Shaina Contic (Greensburg Salem) earned PAC-PAC first-team honors.
Fratto placed third overall and Contic was sixth.
Gina Valotta was named All-PAC honorable mention for placing 21st.
SVC volleyball back in tournament
The St. Vincent College women's volleyball team returned to the Presidents' Athletic Conference tournament after a year absence by earning a fifth seed with a 3-2 win against Grove City.
SVC was down 2-1 but won the final two games 25-16 and 15-11. The Bearcats played at Westminster on Tuesday.
Senior Emily Rosati had 17 kills and junior Anna Christy 31 assists for St. Vincent (16-15, 9-9).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.