ShareThis Page

Disrict college notes: Seton Hill women open with victory

Paul Schofield
| Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

The Mark Katarski era as women's basketball coach at Seton Hill began Monday with his team defeating West Virginia Tech, 90-76, on the road.

Paige Alviani tossed in a game-high 25 points. Katie Gattuso chipped in with 17 points and nine rebounds, Tiara Stossel added 16 points, and Meghan Mastroianni and Kelly Brennan each had 10.

Seton Hill shot 80 percent from the foul line and 51.7 percent from the field.

West Virginia Tech is 0-4.

Seton Hill rolls Pitt-Greensburg

With six players scoring double figures, the Seton Hill men's basketball team opened the season with a 90-54 victory against city rival Pitt-Greensburg on Saturday.

Noah Davis came off the bench to score 15 points and freshman Zach Herman, a Greensburg Central Catholic grad, added 10.

Malachi Leonard had 14 points and 12 rebounds, and Skylar Jones had 12 rebounds.

Jerell Figueroa led Pitt-Greensburg with 10.

SH cross country places 5th in NCAAs

The Seton Hill women's cross country team finished fifth in the NCAA Division II Atlantic Regional at Lock Haven. Edinboro, Mansfield, Indiana and Shippensburg placed in the top four and advanced to the nationals.

Alyssa Brandis and Jeannie Bujdos earned all-region honors for placing 22nd and 23rd.

Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.