Seton Hill wrestling off to solid start
College Football Videos
Brian Tucker begins his second year as wrestling coach at Seton Hill with high hopes and a big challenge.
The Griffins go into the 2013-14 season in the tough Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference that features both strong Division I and II programs.
Seton Hill is 2-0 with wins against Penn State-Greater Allegheny and Penn State-Mt. Alto. The Griffins also placed fifth at the Washington & Jefferson Invitational and seventh at the Mt. Union Invitational.
“The biggest difference this season is I'm working with my first recruiting class,” Tucker said. “Seventy-five percent are my recruits.”
Heading that freshman class is Greensburg Salem graduate Zach Voytek, who placed second at 157 pounds at W&J and Mt. Union.
Back from the 2012-13 team are A.J. Fisher (141) and Brett Smith (165). Fisher placed sixth at Mt. Union, Andrew Schultz was third at 133, Christian Bosco (Penn-Trafford) was fifth at 185 and Tyler Mohlenrich was seventh at 174.
Bosco transferred from Pitt-Johnstown, while Christian Williams (Yough) was part of the freshman class.
Tucker is preparing his team for the PSAC Championship, which will be held Dec. 7 at Edinboro. The four Division I teams are Edinboro, Bloomsburg, Clarion and Lock Haven, while the Division II teams are Seton Hill, Pitt-Johnstown, Shippensburg, Gannon, Mercyhurst, East Stroudsburg, Kutztown and Millersville.
“The team is looking forward to competing against the Division I wrestlers,” Tucker said. “It shows them what we're working for. Having those teams will bring a nice crowd to the venue.”
Tucker said he expects Voytek, Schultz, Kevin Laubach (141) and Tanner Druck (149) to make an impact.
“We'll make a jump, but just in different ways,” Tucker said. “Because of that, the overall team will see success. We have great kids, character kids.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.