Lofty goals for Gannon women's basketball team
College Football Videos
Not many players can say they were perfect against UConn, the gold standard for women's college basketball. Gannon senior Jen Papich is one of the few, but she wasn't overly impressed.
The Golden Knights played an exhibition game Nov. 1 in Storrs, Conn., and Papich made all three of her field-goal attempts, including two 3-pointers and both of her free throws for 10 points.
But that's not what the 6-foot-1 Fox Chapel graduate remembers most about her performance.
“I found myself on the bench a lot in that game because I was in foul trouble,” said Papich, the reigning PSAC West Player of the Year who averaged 12.3 points and 5.7 rebounds. “So, I think in retrospect, that's probably the thing I remember most in that game is I had a lot of fouls that probably could have been avoided.”
That bit of self-analysis is typical of Papich's personality. While many players consume themselves with stuffing the stat sheet, she chooses to focus on the intangibles — an attitude she said reflects that of her team.
With 12 players returning from last year's group that went to the Elite Eight, Gannon was slotted at No. 2 in the Division II preseason poll. A 6-0 start has the Knights holding down that spot in the latest poll.
Papich said the key to Gannon's success is the players' commitment to unselfishness and to doing the dirty work that helps win games. First-year coach Jim Brunelli immediately was impressed with his team and its leader.
“She's one of those players who is a coach's dream,” Brunelli said. “She takes charges. She gets on the ground for loose balls. She's in the stands. She usually has to guard the better offensive players in the post.”
Papich's contributions went beyond the court this past offseason. During the spring, when Gannon was searching for a coach to replace Cleve Wright, who was hired as the women's coach at Miami (Ohio), Papich and fellow senior Kelley Sundberg took it upon themselves to create a workout book for the rest of the team.
“As a senior, it's more about focusing on everybody else,” said Papich, a biomedical engineering major with a 3.9 GPA. “You really have to make sure everybody else has their head in the right place. Coming off a big season, it's easy to get distracted in the offseason.”
Papich wouldn't allow her teammates to be distracted by the coaching change, nor will she allow them to focus on their ranking. To her, polls are nothing more than opinions based on past accomplishments. The real proof comes on the court, and the Golden Knights have plenty of unfinished business there.
They fell to Bloomsburg in the 2013 PSAC title game before losing in the Elite Eight to eventual national champion Ashland.
Papich said while the NCAA title is the ultimate goal, the Golden Knights are committed to keeping their attention on each game, practice and wind sprint — the small details that add up to big wins.
“I feel like there's a lot of misdirected, outside pressure on people who score a lot, and I don't think that's necessarily what makes a good team,” Papich said. “I think that's what honestly makes us a good team is we're willing to do the things that help our teammates to score.
“Those hustle plays are a lot more exciting than somebody casually hitting a three or a layup. If somebody dives on the floor or takes a charge, that's going to be the plays that really get a team fired up.”
Chuck Curti is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.