Plum grad Pietropola off to a successful start in Penn State-Behrend pool
Mia Pietropola concluded her Plum High School swimming career at WPIALs last March with four swims, and she was a part of the Mustangs 200 freestyle relay squad that established a new school record.
Now, the freshman at Penn State-Behrend is starting to make her mark in the collegiate pool as a freshman for the Lions women's squad.
Pietropola has won a team-best 10 events (nine individual, one relay) over Behrend's first six meets.
She claimed the 100 and 200 breaststroke events and swam the opening leg of the winning 400 free relay in a loss at Westminster on Oct. 26.
Pietropola came back Nov. 2 at Allegheny and repeated wins in both breaststroke events and added her first win of the season in the 200 IM.
She won the 100 breast for the third time against Baldwin Wallace on Nov. 16, and she added her first win in the 50 free.
Pietropola picked up a pair of wins against Chatham on Nov. 22 — the 200 IM and 100 breast.
Behrend found it tough sledding against Gannon on Nov. 26, as the Lady Golden Knights won all 13 events in a 192-37 victory.
But Pietropola led the way for the Lions with a pair of individual second-place finishes in the 100 IM (1:05.93) and the 50 breaststroke (33.38).
She also placed fourth in the 100 freestyle (58.45).
For her efforts, Pietropola, it was announced Monday, was named the Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference Female Swimmer of the Week.
It was the second such honor for her this season.
Pietropola and the rest of the Behrend women's swim team will return to action Friday at the three-day Fredonia State Blue Devil Invitational.
The Lions swim at Penn State-Altoona on Dec. 14 at 1 p.m.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or via Twitter @Mlove_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.