Share This Page

Penn State New Kensington rallies, wins on late basket

| Saturday, Dec. 14, 2013, 12:03 a.m.

Shaq went to the rack for Penn State New Kensington.

Shaquille Hager, a 6-foot-5 junior forward, scored a layup with 15 seconds left to lift the Lions to a 68-67 come-from-behind victory at Penn State Greater Allegheny on Friday night.

PSNK's second straight Penn State University Athletic Conference win came after the Lions erased a 20-point halftime deficit.

Hager finished with 22 points and 12 rebounds for PSNK (3-7, 2-3), and Matt Sutton also collected a double-double with 16 points and 10 boards.

Aaron Byrd led PSGA (1-12, 0-5) with 20 points.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.