West Virginia wrestler and Latrobe graduate Pennesi places fourth at Reno
West Virginia senior and Latrobe graduate Nathan Pennesi (133 pounds) placed at the Tournament of Champions in Reno, Nev., for the fourth time in his career. The fourth-place finish is the third-best showing of his career at the tournament.
Pennesi's best finish came in 2010, when he finished in second.
“That is a heck of an accomplishment,” WVU wrestling coach Craig Turnbull said. “It takes a lot of work to do this and wrestle all of those matches in one day. It really shows how good Nathan is and how diligent he is. He has to earn every point and match, and he consistently has done so.”
Pennesi opened the tournament with a pin over Everett Pratt of Cal State Bakersfield. Pennesi followed with a pin in Round 3 over Ty Stevenson of Boise State before losing to Devon Lotito of Cal Poly, 11-5.
He won three matches in the consolation bracket before losing to Lotito once again, this time 5-1 in the third-place bout.
Gulibon earns start against Iowa
Penn State redshirt freshman Jimmy Gulibon earned a start against Iowa on Saturday. Even though he was pinned by Tony Ramos, the former PIAA four-time champion from Derry is starting to share mat time with Jordan Conaway.
Gulibon is 4-6 while wrestling at the 133-pound weight class.
He wrestled in Open tournaments as a freshman.
St. Vincent men start 2-0 in PAC
A strong shooting performance carried the St. Vincent men's basketball team to an easy 92-66 victory against Washington & Jefferson in Presidents' Athletic Conference action.
Isaac Turner scored 30 points, and Dillon Stith added 22 for the Bearcats, who are 2-0 in the conference and 8-2 overall.
St. Vincent doesn't return to action until Jan. 2 at Penn State Fayette.
Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.