ShareThis Page

Pitt-Greensburg men running up the score

| Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014, 8:55 p.m.
Rebecca Emanuele | for the Tribune Review
University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg coach Sean Strickland gives instruction during an October 2013 practice at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg gym.
Rebeca Emanuele | for the Tribune Review
Bobcats junior guard, Brian Heinle, puts up a shot during practice held Wednesday evening, October 30, 2013, at the University of Pittsburgh of Greensburg.
Rebecca Emanuele | for the Tribune Review
Bobcats junior guard, Brian Heinle, puts up a shot during practice held Wednesday evening, October 30, 2013, at the University of Pittsburgh of Greensburg.
Rebecca Emanuele | for the Tribune Review
Bobcats, senior guard forward, Mike Pearson, looks for an open shot during practice held Wednesday evening, October 30, 2013, at the University of Pittsburgh of Greensburg.

At the beginning of the season, the magic number was 80.

That's how many points Pitt-Greensburg's men's basketball team had to average in order to win games.

The magic number has held true for the Bobcats as they are 4-0 whenever they score 80 points or more. Pitt-Greensburg has started 5-5 with a 3-0 record in the Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference.

“We play this way in order for the opposing team to try to catch us with how many points we score,” coach Sean Strickland said.

In the past couple of games, Strickland is pleased with how the defense is playing, especially against top nonconference opponents he has scheduled this season.

“We actually have played a much better defense as of late. In the last game, (Christopher Newport) shot 34 percent from the floor,” Strickland said. “We are getting better and better. Some of the defenses we are playing are confusing to the other team and are sometimes confusing to us.”

With a young team, Strickland has seen the advantages of scheduling strong nonconference opponents, even if that means they might end up in the loss column.

After dropping the first three games to Mount Union, Grove City and Carnegie Mellon, the Bobcats have won five of the last seven games.

“It's been a pretty good start with a pretty rough out-of-conference schedule,” Strickland said. “It took us a long time to figure out everyone's role and to find ourselves. We look forward to getting into the meat of conference play.”

Sophomore guard Jerell Figueroa, who leads the team with 15.7 points per game, scored 24 points against Franciscan, 22 points against Grove City and 21 against Pitt-Bradford.

Sophomore guard Rocco Contristano, a Keystone Oaks grad, is second on the team with 15.2 ppg. Contristano scored 27 points against Elizabethtown and 20 points against Juniata.

Freshman Marcus Thomas, a transfer from Clarion, has averaged 11.4 ppg and 9.5 rpg. Thomas, who has four double-doubles this season, recorded his most recent one against NCAA Division III No. 18 Christopher Newport, a 76-70 loss, with 15 points and 15 rebounds.

“I think we have gained confidence. We hung in there in the game against the No. 18 team in the nation,” Strickland said. “It showed them when they are playing their game they are able to play with anyone. They should be playing with a lot of confidence with the rest of the conference schedule to go.”

After finishing 9-16 in the past three seasons, Strickland believes this team will finish the season strong and improve their record of previous seasons.

“The main thing is that we are shooting the ball well. We have been shooting over 50 percent in the last six games,” Strickland said. “We have spent time recruiting good people and not just good players. The team has faced a lot of adversity and they have gotten over the hump. This year, we have a lot of team bonding and the added chemistry.”

Andrew John is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.