Ex-Mars swimming great looking for big things at Big East championship
Former Mars standout Jack Muehlheuser expects a revamped Big East Conference to help him and his Georgetown University teammates at the conference men's swimming championship from Feb. 19 to 22 in Sewell, N.J.
Muehlheuser, a sophomore, will compete in three events for the second consecutive season.
He posted his best times in placing 19th in the 100-yard backstroke (51.91 seconds) and tying for 17th in the 200 backstroke (1 minute, 51.53 seconds) a year ago.
He also swam in the 200 individual medley (2:00.79), as Georgetown finished sixth among nine teams.
With fewer teams competing in the reconstructed conference, Muehlheuser expects himself and the Hoyas to do much better.
Top teams, including Pitt, which finished third last year, no longer are in the conference.
“It's going to be a good battle for the title between us and Xavier,” said Muehlheuser, 20. “It should be fun.
“It reminds me of my senior year in high school. I'll feed off that adrenaline to do well individually.”
Led by Muelheuser — the WPIAL and PIAA Class AA champion in the 100 backstroke — Mars surprised many by finishing second at the state meet two years ago.
“We're counting on Jack getting us points,” Georgetown coach Jamie Holder said. “He should have some big time drops.
“He's a very diligent worker who's provided depth.”
Muehlheuser finished fourth in the 100 backstroke (53.74) in a quad meet against Rutgers, Seton Hall and Villanova earlier this season.
At the Bucknell Invitational, where there were nine teams, he finished 19th in the 200 backstroke (1:54.91).
A finance student, Muehlheuser is considering a career in banking.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.