Gateway grad reaches 1,000 points in final Clarion game
College Football Videos
Gateway grad Mike Kromka created a special moment in his final game as a member of the Clarion University men's basketball team.
In the last game of a tough 5-20 season for the Golden Eagles, Kromka needed 33 points for 1,000 in his collegiate career.
At one point in the 98-90 loss to Edinboro on Feb. 26, it didn't look like he was going to reach the milestone.
Kromka had 12 points at halftime, and he needed a big second half to get to the mark.
He had 21 points with a little more than two minutes left in the game.
But the 6-foot-6 forward went on a big personal run and scored 13 points over the final 2:22.
He parlayed a 3-pointer, a layup, a dunk, one free throws and conventional 3-point play to put him one shy of 1,000 with 20 seconds to go.
Kromka then converted a layup off of a turnover with 17 seconds to play for his 34th point of the game.
The two-point bucket also set him at 1,001 career points.
He added 10 rebounds for a double-double, and he finished his career with 729 rebounds, the sixth most at Clarion since records became available in 1971.
Kromka finished second on the team in scoring this season at 14.1 points per game. He averaged a team-best 8.8 rebounds a contest.
He scored in double figures in 18 of Clarion's 25 games this season.
Kromka also had 10 or more rebounds eight times, with his high of 20 coming in a season-opening win against Penn State-DuBois.
The University of Pittsburgh men's swim team wrapped up competition Saturday at the Atlantic Coast Conference Championships, and Gateway graduate Luke Nosbisch contributed some strong swims.
On day one, Nosbisch was part of the Panthers men's 200 medley relay team that swam the fastest time in Pitt history by going 1:27.21 for a seventh overall finish.
That time beat the previous record of 1:27.34 set at the 2013 Big East Championships, and Nosbisch was a part of that school-record swim as well.
He came back on day two and recorded Pitt's second-best time of the season in the 500 free and a personal record of 4:26.42. He swam in one of the bonus finals later in the day and placed 22nd overall.
Nosbisch continued his fast swims on day three Friday with a Pitt season best in the 100 breast. His time of 54.48 was good enough to bring him back for a bonus final Friday night, and he placed 24th overall.
On Saturday morning, he swam to a time of 1:56.81 in the 200 breast preliminaries and earned a second swim in the consolation finals.
He just missed the A-cut and finished ninth overall in the prelim. That earned him a return trip for the consolation finals in the evening, and he placed 16th overall.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.