ShareThis Page

Point Park women look to break through at NAIA tournament

| Monday, March 10, 2014, 10:24 p.m.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Point Park's Katresa Savisky brings the ball up the court while guarded by Mt. Vernon Nazarene's Courtney Christie during the Pioneers' 65-57 victory over the Cougars on Thursday, Dec. 19, 2013.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Point Park's Haley Sauer looks to pass the ball against Mt.Vernon Nazarene during the Pioneers win over the Cougars on Thursday December 19, 2013.

Point Park's women's basketball team spent a good amount of time packing for a trip to Iowa.

The Pioneers are hoping for an extended stay.

Point Park makes its third consecutive trip to the NAIA Division II national tournament, which opens Wednesday at the Tyson Events Center/Gateway Arena in Sioux City.

The seventh-seeded Pioneers (29-4) meet second-seeded Morningside (27-6) at 8 p.m. on Thursday in the 32-team, single-elimination tournament.

“We were pretty shocked we were seeded as low as we were for having 29 wins,” Point Park coach Tony Grenek said. “Six teams ranked ahead of us all had lost and they didn't drop in the poll. We won six in a row and we dropped a spot. We can't control that, though.”

Point Park has dropped its first-round game the past two seasons. Last year, the Pioneers fell to eventual national champion Indiana Wesleyan. They have a tough first-round matchup this time, too.

“When you're playing against some great teams, you might as well play one of the best right off the bat,” Grenek said.

Point Park's players, especially its five seniors, hope to break through this time.

“The senior class has been there to experience it, and we do not want to go out there and do the same thing we did the past two years,” said guard/forward Katresa Savisky, a Butler graduate. “I don't want to stomach another first-round loss. It means a lot to have that experience. Hopefully, we can use it to our advantage.”

The Pioneers feature a young lineup with freshmen Sam Weir (Riverside) and Carly Forse (Bishop Canevin) joining sophomore Alexa Xenakis (Keystone Oaks), junior Kayla Kiriau and Savisky in the starting lineup.

“The players who have been with me for three years, including the five seniors and (junior) Haley Sauer, they have cut down nets three years in a row,” Grenek said. “We have great experience on what takes place out there and that will only help the younger girls as well.”

Point Park overcame the loss of its top returning scorer and rebounder in New Castle's Ja'Nia McPhatter, who missed the season with a foot injury, to post a school-record 29 wins.

“We battled through a lot this year. We were very young and had a lot of different faces in the lineup,” Grenek said. “The girls were able to pull through and jell at tournament time. It's been very rewarding to see how they overcame a lot of obstacles.”

The Pioneers set a program record with 14 consecutive wins to start the year. They dropped four of their next 13 games, but rebounded to win their next six, including all three at the KIAC tournament.

“I think we finally hit our peak,” said Sauer, a Shaler product. “I think we understand what we need to do to be at our best. Even in practices, we're doing well. Really, we're on top of our game.”

Point Park's players believe experiencing adversity made the team stronger.

“Every team goes through that. I think everybody was pretty shocked, too,” Forse said. “I am not glad that we lost, but losing was a learning point for us, and I think it'll help us when we go to nationals.”

The Pioneers, who need five wins in six days to win a national title, are rallying around their low seed.

“That is the thing that's keeping us going,” Xanakis said. “A lot of people ahead of us have worse records. After winning our conference championship game, we dropped in the rankings even more. It really put a fire under us.”

Joe Sager is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.