Local college notebook: St. Vincent track runs first meet ever
College Football Videos
It was a historic day for the newly formed St. Vincent track and field team.
The Bearcats competed in the Cal U Early Bird meet Saturday, and senior Andrew Razanauskas won the 10,000-meter run. Freshman August Sander took third.
The team of Chris Hameed, Chansler Poole, Justin Petrovich and Vincent Tonzo won the men's 3,200 relay race, and the same group placed second in the 1,600 relay.
Senior Nick Killen and freshman Jimmy Farnan placed third and fourth in the 3,000 men's steeplechase, and junior Eric Porter ended up fifth in the men's 5,000.
Senior Rachael Paszko finished second in the women's 10,000. Freshman Shaina Contic placed third in the women's, 3,000 steeplechase.
Senior Genie Fratto finished fourth in the women's 5,000.
Cramer hurls gem for St. Vincent
Freshman Mike Cramer tossed a one-hitter in leading St. Vincent (4-9, 1-1) to a 5-2 victory in Presidents' Athletic Conference win over Westminster.
Cramer carried a no-hitter into the sixth inning. He walked one and struck out nine.
Westminster rallied for an 8-7 victory in Game 2 of the doubleheader.
Jon White had two hits for the Bearcats in Game 1. In the second game, Ben Webb and Tanner Master each had two hits and Joey Fearer had a two-run double.
SVC softball sweeps
The St. Vincent softball team (12-4) opened the home season with a sweep of Franciscan, winning 8-1 and 10-0.
Sarah Swettlen homered, and Breanne Wallace hit a double and single in Game 1. Wallace had two hits, including a double, and three RBIs, and Laken Lyon hit two hits and two RBIs in Game 2.
Samantha Emert earned the win in Game 2. She allowed one hit over four hits and struck out eight.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.