ShareThis Page

9 state universities challenged over athletic opportunities for women

Debra Erdley
| Thursday, April 17, 2014, 10:34 p.m.

Nine universities in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education have failed to comply with Title IX, a federal law that requires them to provide equal athletic opportunities for women, a new complaint charges.

The complaint, filed with the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, asks the agency to investigate and address what the Women's Law Project maintains is the “historical and ongoing failure” of the schools to provide equal opportunities for female athletes.

The Women's Law Project charged that a statistical analysis shows that Bloomsburg, Cheyney, Clarion, Indiana, Kutztown, Lock Haven, Mansfield, Millersville, and Shippensburg universities have shorted female athletes on average between 7 and 15 percent over decade between 2003 and 2013.

Sue Frietsche, senior staff attorney for the Women's Law Project, said the data suggest that collectively the nine schools are short 900 athletic opportunities for women.

Three PASSHE universities—Indiana, West Chester and Slippery Rock—have been successfully sued in federal court for Title IX violations over the past two decades,

State System spokesman Kenn Marshall, however, said the schools are diligent in their efforts to uphold Title IX.

“All of our universities take their responsibilities under Title IX very seriously. Despite being faced with changing demographics in the state — which have resulted in relatively flat or even declining enrollments across the system — as well as significant, long-term financial challenges, all of the institutions have made progress toward achieving gender equity in the area of athletic participation,” Marshall said.

The Office of Civil Rights has the authority to issue recommendations to resolve Title IX inequities and can withhold federal funds when schools fail to comply.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.