ShareThis Page
Duquesne

Duquesne women have shot at NCAA Tournament

Jerry DiPaola
| Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2018, 8:06 p.m.
Blackhawk graduate Chassidy Omogrosso surpassed 1,000 career points this season for the Duquesne women's bsaketball team.
Duquesne athletics
Blackhawk graduate Chassidy Omogrosso surpassed 1,000 career points this season for the Duquesne women's bsaketball team.

Duquesne women's coach Dan Burt wants to make himself perfectly clear:

He carries no personal grudge against Charlie Creme.

In fact, he sincerely appreciates the “great service” Creme does for women's basketball by posting a projected NCAA Tournament bracket on ESPN.com and helping build interest in the sport.

Nonetheless …

“Charlie Creme doesn't know what he's talking about,” Burt said. “Other than the (NCAA Tournament committee) people who are in that room March 10, 11, 12,” Burt said, “no one really knows.”

For fear of burying the lead, Creme's bracketology doesn't include a Duquesne team that will take a 16-3 record (6-0 in the Atlantic 10) into Philadelphia on Wednesday night to play St. Joseph's.

Burt isn't hurt by the snub. He's too busy to worry about such things in January — unless, of course, a reporter asks him about it.

“You can look at all the math and the projections,” he said. “About the only thing we're worried about is winning the next game.”

Duquesne is No. 59 in the most recent NCAA RPI rankings, which is tops in the Atlantic 10 — one better than Dayton (14-4, 7-0), projected by Creme as an 11th seed.

“If we can continue to be successful and we don't have any bad losses, we're going to be right there squarely on the bubble, in the 44-46 (RPI) range,” Burt said.

Duquesne's postseason cause will be helped by top-100 victories against No. 37 Virginia, No. 39 Central Michigan, No. 45 Toledo and No. 91 George Washington.

Burt admits the Atlantic 10 doesn't have the top-to-bottom strength as in past years. The conference typically sent three teams to the NCAA Tournament, but only two went last year and that could be the limit this year, too.

“The league is a little bit down with some of the teams at the bottom with their RPIs and their scheduling, and it's affecting all of us,” he said.

But the Dukes have won six in a row since a 104-52 loss to No. 1 Connecticut in Toronto on Dec. 22.

“This is as good a team as he's had,” Burt said of UConn coach Geno Auriemma. “We lost to the most dominant basketball program in the world.”

Duquesne is led by its leading scorers — junior guards Chassidy Omogrosso of Blackhawk and Julijana Vojinovic of Serbia, who are averaging 17.3 and 16.3 points.

Kadri-Ann Lass, a 6-foot-3 forward from Estonia, is tied for seventh in the nation with 61 blocks and needs three to break the school record of 177, held for the past 31 years by Tanya Larrydale.

In its most recent game Sunday, Duquesne trailed by eight at halftime to George Mason but rallied to win 71-64. Omogrosso scored 28 points, and Lass added 14 and shared rebounding honors with Paige Cannon (eight).

“Some people told me it was the most physical women's basketball game they've seen at Duquesne,” said Burt, who later got a congratulatory text from Duquesne President Ken Gormley.

Burt was encouraged by the next day's practice, which was one of the best of the season, he said.

“We could have taken a day off (after the difficult victory), but we were good to go,” he said.

Part of that is the competition for playing time, thanks to the depth Burt has built through recruiting channels overseas and in the WPIAL.

“We're so close in terms of the talent level that those who are playing the majority of the minutes, they can't take a break,” he said.

“They feel the footsteps. They feel the breath on the back of their neck.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me