Rhode Island rallies to down Duquesne
College Football Videos
Duquesne's Andre Marhold has embraced an idea that could apply to more than just him.
The Dukes erased an eight-point second-half deficit but couldn't hold the lead in Saturday night's 67-62 loss to Rhode Island at Palumbo Center. The effort was there, yet their late-game execution was not.
“Coach stressed the fact that there's a difference between playing hard and making plays,” said Marhold, who had 10 points and tied a career high with five blocks.
The Dukes (8-17, 1-10 Atlantic 10) led by four with four minutes left, yet saw it slip away.
A foul shot by Mike Powell and a layup by Nikola Malesevic gave Rhode Island a 61-58 lead with 57 seconds left. Duquesne turnovers led to both Rhode Island possessions. A jumper by Colter cut the lead to one before Rhode Island (8-16, 3-8) made six consecutive free throws in the final 18 seconds to escape.
In contrast, the Dukes made just 7 of 20 from the free throw line.
Malesevic scored 19 points for Rhode Island, and Xavier Munford had 14. Derrick Colter led Duquesne with 20 points, and Jerry Jones had 11.
The loss left Duquesne alone at the bottom of the A-10 standings after a game the Dukes expected to win. Rhode Island sits next to last in the 16-team conference, and only the top 12 qualify for the league's postseason tournament.
“This one hurts a lot because we're still fighting,” Duquesne coach Jim Ferry said. “We're trying to get in, trying to make a run.”
Duquesne earned its first conference win two nights earlier at Temple, ending an 11-game losing streak. The Dukes have five games left, including a trip Tuesday to Butler (20-5).
“Even though we've lost a couple games in a row, our team still has confidence,” Marhold said. “We're just trying to make it to the playoffs.”
Duquesne used a 14-2 run to erase an eight-point second-half deficit. The run included a go-ahead basket by Marhold with 11:37 left. A 3-pointer by Colter 25 seconds later gave the Dukes a 47-43 lead.
Rhode Island forced ties at 47-47 and 49-49, and then retook the lead, 51-49, on a tip-in by Malesevic with 6:56 left.
A quick 5-0 run let the Dukes reclaim the lead, 57-53, with 3:40 left, but it was short-lived. Tied 58-58 with 2:39 left, the Dukes had turnovers on their next two possessions.
“This loss definitely is different because everybody fought so hard to win,” said Marhold, who strengthened his starter status following a double-double against Temple.
“Everybody in their mind knew we were going to win this game. That's why it hurt, because we ended up short.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.