ShareThis Page

Duquesne men pull away in second half to beat Albany 70-59

| Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2013, 9:03 p.m.

With a 10-day layoff ahead, Duquesne feels rather thankful.

Ovie Soko had 23 points and 13 rebounds, and the Dukes held Albany without a field goal for the final five minutes of a 70-59 nonconference victory Wednesday night at Palumbo Center that highlighted Duquesne's inconsistent defense.

Albany led 57-56 with 5:28 left when Peter Hooley scored two of his team-high 21 points. But the Great Danes missed their final nine shots as the Dukes rekindled a defensive intensity that had disappeared after halftime.

“We've still got a long way to go,” Soko said. “It's kind of a good thing we have some time off now from games, so we can really tighten (the defense) up.”

A five-point run by Soko, which included a 3-pointer with 3:24 left, gave Duquesne a 63-58 lead it never lost. Tra'Vaughn White scored 15 points for the Dukes (2-2), and Jeremiah Jones scored 10.

The late-game defensive stops were a confidence boost for a team striving to solidify its defense. So, too, was nearly the entire first half, when Albany committed 13 turnovers. But a rough second-half start was troublesome for the Dukes, who led 30-16 at halftime.

“We'll get 10 crazy days of defense,” said Duquesne coach Jim Ferry, whose team won't play again until Nov. 30 against Pitt.

Albany (2-2) endured an awful first half. The Great Danes made just 5 of 20 shots. Hooley was 4 of 6 for 10 points, but his teammates were just 1 for 14 in the first half. The 16 points were the fewest allowed in a half by Duquesne in Ferry's two seasons.

That was a welcomed effort by the Dukes, who allowed 49 first-half points three days earlier against West Virginia. But Albany started the second half by making eight straight shots and 12 of its first 13.

“They did the same thing against Sienna and NJIT,” Ferry said. “They were down in both those games (and won). I knew they were a second-half team.”

With 12:28 left, Albany claimed its first lead at 44-43 on a layup by Luke Devlin. The lead changed 10 times and was tied five others.

“The lead evaporated within minutes,” Soko said, “so we've still got a lot of work to do.”

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.