The West Virginia women's basketball team snapped a two-game losing streak against Duquesne and pushed its overall winning streak to 10 games with an 88-80 win at Palumbo Center on Saturday.
Four Mountaineers scored in double digits, led by senior center Asya Bussie with 17 points and 11 rebounds. It was Bussie's 10th double-double and third this season. Averee Fields had 15 points, followed by Taylor Palmer with 11 and Linda Stepney with 10.
It feels great,” Bussie said of West Virginia's victory. “We needed this win.We definitely couldn't lose three years in a row.
“We'll be able to have a nice break, and Coach (Mike) Carey can relax during the break.”
Sophomore point guard April Robinson led Duquesne with a career-high 20 points, while Butler native Olivia Bresnahan had 19 off the bench in her first game since the 2011-12 season after transferring from Florida State. Wumi Agunbiade scored 17 points and had eight rebounds, and Raegan Moore added 11 points.
After leading 38-30 at halftime, West Virginia controlled the first eight minutes of the second half and led by as many as 26 with 14:11 to play.
Duquesne closed the gap to seven with just more than three minutes remaining, and Bresnahan hit a 3-pointer with 30 seconds left to make it 83-77, but the Dukes could not complete the comeback. They lost for just the second time in eight games.
“We certainly put up a valiant effort in the last 10 minutes of the game,” said Duquesne coach Dan Burt. “We came out in the second and, frankly, they punched us in the face, and we did not answer as quick as we needed to.
“That's how you get yourself down 26. And you can't get down to a team of West Virginia's caliber, player-wise and coaching-wise, and expect to come back.”
Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at email@example.com or via Twitter @KarenPrice_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.