Richmond deals Duquesne 4th straight defeat
College Football Videos
Duquesne's Ovie Soko had 21 points but the team's losing streak reached four games Wednesday night with a 75-58 loss to Atlantic 10 visitor Richmond at Palumbo Center.
The Dukes (10-13, 2-8), with just six conference games left, have now lost eight of their past nine in the A-10.
“Everyone's disappointed,” Soko said. “We don't feel like we've played to the best of our ability. And our record doesn't reflect the kind of team we have, I don't believe.”
But losing to Richmond isn't new. The Dukes are 1-16 against the Spiders since they joined the conference in 2001. Duquesne fell behind 17-3 and never led. It was the team's third-lowest point total this season, well below its 74.9 average. The Dukes shot just 38 percent, but allowed Richmond to shoot 45.
“We got completely out-played on both sides of the basketball,” Duquesne coach Jim Ferry said. “I thought they shredded our defense in man-to-man and zone. And they did a great job defending us.”
Kendall Anthony scored 20 points for Richmond (16-8, 6-3), which had four scorers in double figures. All seven players had at least two baskets.
With a Princeton-style offense that can control the ball and spread the scoring, all seven Spiders had at least two baskets.
“When they have a six-point lead, it feels like 26 because they're so patient,” Ferry said, “and they can beat you for a layup.”
The Spiders were playing their third game without leading scorer Cedrick Lindsay. The senior guard, whose 18.3-point average ranked third among A-10 scores, was lost for the season with torn meniscus in both knees. But without him, Anthony's role has grown. The 5-foot-8 junior had 28 points in a victory over St. Bonaventure and 31 in a loss to VCU.
Anthony made 5 of 14 shots against Duquesne, but also 6 of 6 from the foul line. Two free throws by Anthony gave Richmond its largest lead, 61-38 with 8:28 left.
“He's a quick, little guy,” sophomore Micah Mason said. “He's a great player who's so aggressive. It's hard to stay in front of him.”
Mason, the nation's leader in 3-point shooting at 59.7 percent, was 3 of 7 from the arc and scored 15 points.
Quick 3-pointers by Kendall Anthony and Wayne Sparrow built a 6-0 lead for Richmond, which made seven 3s on 15 first-half attempts.
Opponents have shot 43.1 percent from the arc against Duquesne's defense, which ranks last in the A-10 against the 3-pointer. The Spiders needed just four minutes to build a double-digit lead. Richmond led 17-3 with 15:14 until halftime, when ShawnDre' Jones found a rebound and scored in the lane.
Duquesne made one field goal in the first six minutes and had more turnovers (four) than points (three). A basket by Dominique McKoy and a free throw by Soko were the only points until McKoy scored again with 13:22 left. The Dukes made just two of their first seven shots, including 0 for 3 from the arc.
Trailing by 14, Duquesne found a 9-2 run with a 3-pointer by Desmond Ridenour and an alley-oop from Ridenour to Soko. With 9:52 until halftime, the lead was 21-14.
But Richmond maintained the lead. With 4:55 left, The Spiders' first-half lead peaked at 35-21 after a running 3-pointer by Anthony. The Spiders led at halftime 39-27.
Two free throws by McKoy early in the second half had the Dukes back within single digits, 43-34, with 17:20 left. But they moved no closer.
“Everybody's a little frustrated,” Ferry said. “They kids are losing a little confidence right now, and we can't allow that to happen.”
Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.