Share This Page

Duquesne eyes 2nd chances in Atlantic 10 tournament

| Wednesday, March 12, 2014, 7:00 p.m.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Duquesne's Tra'Vaughn White tries to push the ball past UMass' Trey Davis at the A. J. Palumbo Center on Wednesday, March 5, 2014.

Duquesne coach Jim Ferry predicts that this Atlantic 10 Championship could be unpredictable.

“Someone could win this tournament that no one is really expecting,” Ferry said, “because everybody is so close, and we've all beaten each other up.”

That would be ideal for No. 10 seed Duquesne (13-16, 5-11), which has a first-round matchup with No. 7 Richmond (18-13, 8-8) on Thursday night at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. The Dukes lost to Richmond, 75-58, on Feb. 12 at Palumbo Center, but the Spiders have lost their past four games.

“We have all the ability to compete with any team that's going to be in New York,” senior Ovie Soko said.

Duquesne has improved since its loss to Richmond, with a Feb. 27 win at then-No. 10 Saint Louis as proof. The Dukes traveled to New York having won three of their last six, with winnable, last-minute losses to St. Bonaventure, Dayton and Massachusetts.

“We still have a lot to fight for,” Soko said. “I definitely feel like we're a team that's made strides all year long, especially some of the young guys. At this point, I think we're playing pretty well.”

All 13 conference teams qualified for the A-10 Championship this season. A year ago, the conference took only 12 of 16 teams, and Duquesne was left home.

A year ago, No. 1 seed Saint Louis beat No. 2 VCU in the A-10 final, but that predictability isn't guaranteed.

“Anyone could beat anyone,” Soko said. “You can't really look at how the conference games have gone because a lot of the games have been decided by under five points.”

Richmond was better than Duquesne on Feb. 12. The Dukes fell behind 17-3 and never led. The Spiders made 7 of 8 3-pointers in the first half to lead 39-27 at halftime.

Richmond junior guard Kendall Anthony had four 3-pointers and 20 points. Three teammates also scored in double figures.

“They beat us up,” Soko said. “They beat us to 50-50 balls, and they came out really hot, which compounded that. They just played an all-around really good game.”

Duquesne has a history of trouble with Richmond. The Dukes are 1-16 against the Spiders since they joined the conference in 2001. But this will be their first postseason matchup.

“We're fighting for a championship,” sophomore Micah Mason said. “We think right now that we can play with anybody.”

Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at charlan@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.