Share This Page

Report: Non-football schools discuss leaving Big East

| Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012, 9:02 p.m.

Representatives from the Big East's non-football schools — DePaul, Georgetown, Marquette, Providence, Seton Hall, St. John's and Villanova — met Sunday with conference commissioner Mike Aresco to discuss the league's TV future, which is up for grabs.

The seven schools are attempting to secure the best television deal possible and are debating whether to split from the Big East, according to an ESPN.com report.

The seven schools have a majority vote, with the three remaining FBS members being Connecticut, Cincinnati and South Florida. But the group of seven doesn't have the two-thirds vote to dissolve the league. Temple athletic director Bill Bradshaw told the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Owls are a full voting member, even though they don't join in all sports until July 1, 2013, and likely wouldn't vote to dissolve the league.

A possible landing spot for the Big East's non-football schools could be the Atlantic 10, which has discussed the possibility of a 21-team basketball league, a source with direct knowledge of the situation told ESPN.com Tuesday.

The A-10 is a 16-team basketball conference this season, but Temple and Charlotte are set to leave. Butler and VCU, two programs that were in the 2011 Final Four, are set to join the A-10.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.