Share This Page

No. 5 Oregon upsets top-seeded Penn State in volleyball semifinals

| Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012, 10:08 p.m.
Oregon players Canace Finley, left, Katherine Fischer (12), and Liz Brenner (6) celebrate a second game victory over Penn State in the national semifinals of the NCAA college women's volleyball tournament semifinal in Louisville, Ky., Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Garry Jones)
Penn State's Deja McClendon's hit is blocked bu Oregon's Liz Brenner during the national semifinals of the NCAA college women's volleyball tournament Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012 in Louisville, Ky. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Liz Brenner had 17 kills and 17 digs to help fifth-seeded Oregon sweep the final three sets and upset top-seeded Penn State on Thursday night in the NCAA women's volleyball semifinals.

The Ducks (30-4) won, 21-25, 30-28, 25-22, 25-19, to advance to the title game Saturday night against third-seeded Texas, a five-set winner over unseeded Michigan.

Alaina Bergsma and Katherine Fischer each had 16 kills for the Ducks, who are appearing in their first Final Four. Bergsma added 15 digs, Fischer 12 as Oregon was 63 percent on team attacks.

“I'm probably not supposed to say this, but I have no idea how we won that match because they are really good,” Oregon coach Jim Moore said about the Nittany Lions.

Ariel Scott had 18 kills for Penn State (33-3).

Oregon beat Penn State for the second straight season. The Ducks won last season's opener over the Nittany Lions, ending their 94-match home winning streak.

This time, the Ducks ended the Nittany Lions' bid to win their fifth national title in six years.

Of course, Oregon had many of its owns strengths.

The Ducks entered the game leading the nation in team kills per set (15.97) and team assists (14.91). Most of that was due to Oregon's mix of quickness and improvisation that won all but two sets in the tournament.

Penn State nonetheless presented a huge challenge, having lost just one tournament set coming in. Size and movement had a lot to do with the Nittany Lions' domination this season, though it took some work to put away Oregon in the first set.

There were five lead changes and 14 ties in the opening frame, the last at 20-20 as the Nittany Lions got a point off an attack error. Penn State scored four in a row off Oregon mistakes and won it on a Katie Slay kill on an assist from Micha Hancock, the All-American setter.

Oregon controlled most of the second set, building a 20-10 lead as Penn State struggled on offense and defense. The Nittany Lions also played for a stretch without Hancock, who turned her left ankle after coming down on Fischer's foot.

But Penn State tied the set with a 14-4 run and traded the lead with Oregon before the Ducks finally won it on Brenner's kill.

Oregon led 19-16 in the third but Penn State rallied to tie the game at 19 and again at 21. A bad set from Penn State's Dominique Gonzalez gave Oregon the go-ahead point before Fischer added two kills for a 24-22 lead and the eventual set win.

Oregon's serve befuddled Penn State throughout but especially in the final two games as the Nittany Lions struggled to set up opportunities and seemed out of place for many returns.

“I thought we had a few opportunities in the second game that we let slip away,” Penn State coach Russ Rose said. “I just think we lost a lot of confidence and steam at that point.”

Texas won the first semifinal, 25-11, 21-25, 23-25, 25-12, 15-11.

Bailey Webster had 18 kills, and Haley Eckerman added 16 for the Longhorns.

Texas (28-4) dominated the first and fourth sets and took a 4-0 lead in the final set before Michigan tied it at 8. After a timeout, the Longhorns won three straight points and held off the Wolverines.

“The fans got their money's worth. What a battle,” Texas coach Jerritt Elliott said.

“I've been saying it, that we're good in the crunch. You never see them give up. Even though we give up games, you can just see that they stay in their routine and just battle.”

Sarah Palmer had a career-high 31 digs for the Longhorns, 3-0 lifetime against the Wolverines.

Junior outside hitter Lexi Erwin had 26 kills and a career-high 87 attempts for unseeded Michigan (27-12), which was appearing in its first Final Four. Senior captain Claire McElheny added 15 kills and had a .419 hitting percentage.

Texas entered the semifinals having won 21 of 22 matches since a 6-3 start that included a loss to Penn State. That roll earned the Longhorns their fourth Final Four berth in the past five years with a bigger goal of closing the deal after blowing a 2-0 lead and losing to Penn State in the 2009 final.

The Longhorns wasted no time carrying out their strategy, using their size and power to dominate the first set.

Webster had six kills, Khat Bell four and Eckerman three as Texas mounted several runs and put the set out of reach with seven straight points for a 14-5 lead. A 5-2 run clinched the 25-11 win for the Longhorns, with Webster adding two kills while their defense deny the Wolverines at the net.

Unfazed, Michigan improved its attack and won the next two sets with several small scoring spurts that provided a cushion against Texas.

Texas quickly seized the momentum and ran away with the fourth set with left-side help from Webster. Her presence created matchup problems for Michigan and the Longhorns took advantage for a .455 attack percentage en route to a dominating 25-12 win.

Having found their rhythm, the Longhorns grabbed the early advantage in the fifth set and didn't flinch after the Wolverines tied the set.

Michigan's loss ended a resilient run to its first Final Four, one that included overcoming several losing streaks before turning things around late in the season. The Wolverines definitely had found their groove over the past month, beating conference rival Michigan State twice and upending Stanford in the Berkeley Regional final.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.