College football notebook: Overall bowl attendances drops
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Jan. 11, 2013, 8:10 p.m.
• College football bowl attendance fell by more than 2 percent in 2012-13, a decline that concerns administrators as the FBS prepares for a move to a four-team playoff system in 2014. Overall bowl attendance was down 42,391 over 35 games, an average drop of roughly 1,210 per game. Bowls drew an average of 49,224 fans per game, marking the first time that average bowl attendance was less than 50,000 since USA Today Sports began tracking the statistic in 2004-05. A few bowl games made great improvements in attendance, such as Pitt vs. Ole Miss in the BBVA Compass Bowl, which drew an additional 29,409 fans, and BYU vs. San Diego State in the Poinsettia Bowl, which increased its attendance by 10,835.
• Alabama tailback Eddie Lacy, cornerback Dee Milliner and right tackle D.J. Fluker are skipping their senior seasons to enter the NFL Draft after helping lead the Crimson Tide to a second straight national title.
• Arizona State coach Todd Graham added former Texas Tech interim coach Chris Thomsen to his staff as the Sun Devils' running backs coach.
• Iowa State quarterback Jared Barnett, who went from the starter to a third stringer in just over two months, decided to leave after two seasons.
• President Barack Obama called Alabama coach Nick Saban to congratulate him on another BCS championship, joking that “he and the Crimson Tide are beginning to make this a habit.” Obama noted that it was the third time he'd made the congratulatory call to the coach.
• Scott Shafer was introduced as the new coach at Syracuse, and he emotionally vowed to continue what Doug Marrone started four years ago.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.