Share This Page

College notebook: Kelly unsure how hoax affected Te'o's play

| Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2013, 9:06 p.m.

Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te'o didn't show any signs of being affected by the girlfriend hoax leading up to the BCS title game, but his play indicates it may have taken a toll, coach Brian Kelly said Tuesday.

“Hindsight is 20-20. I didn't think going into the game he was affected by it. But he didn't play his best. Alabama had something to do with that, clearly. But I really don't know,” Kelly said.

“It's a lot to weigh on the shoulders of somebody. I think we can make the leap that maybe it did. But I think Manti would know for sure.”

Kelly spoke to reporters by conference call for the first time since the Irish were beaten, 42-14, by Alabama in the BCS title game on Jan. 7.

Te'o said in an interview with ESPN after news of the hoax broke that it did not affect his performance in the title game blowout.

Despite all that's happened, Kelly said he will still remember Te'o as one of the best teammates and leaders he's been around in 22 years of coaching.

Report: Judge rules NCAA athletes can pursue TV revenue

A federal judge dismissed a motion by the NCAA to prevent football and men's basketball players from legally pursuing a cut of live television revenues, according to an ESPN report.

Judge Claudia Wilken rejected the NCAA's motion that players in the anti-trust suit led by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon should be precluded from continuing with their lawsuit.

“Now the (NCAA and its co-defendants) are facing potential liability in the billions of dollars instead of tens or hundreds of millions,” said Michael Hausfeld, interim lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “It's a more accurate context for what the players deserve.”

Big Ten could reshuffle by ‘14

The Big Ten might put more emphasis on geography when shuffling divisions after eastern schools Maryland and Rutgers join the Midwest-centric league by 2014.

Penn State athletic director Dave Joyner said officials within the league have had several discussions over the phone about potential divisional alignments.

“I have a feeling it will be more geography-based,” Joyner said. “There seems to be a lot of sentiment for that.”

Big 12 working on bowl lineup

The Big 12 is working to determine its preferred bowl lineup with the expectation that the Cotton Bowl will become part of college football's new playoff system.

Big 12 athletic directors wrapped up a two-day meeting with a 2½-hour discussion about their bowl alignment. Under current arrangements through the 2013 season, the Cotton Bowl gets the top pick of league teams not in the BCS.

Commissioner Bob Bowlsby said it's also a priority for the league to get a spot in a Florida bowl game.

Mizzou gets stadium gift

Missouri received an $8.3 million gift from Don and Audrey Walsworth of Marceline, Mo., to be used to improve and expand Memorial Stadium and also build a new clubhouse for the men's and women's golf teams at a private course in Columbia.

The school plans to add 6,000 seats to its football stadium, which now holds 71,004 fans. Eight SEC stadiums hold more than 80,000, with Bryant-Denny Stadium at Alabama and Tennessee's Neyland Stadium topping 100,000.

Around the nation

Virginia offensive coordinator Bill Lazor is joining Chip Kelly's Eagles staff as quarterbacks coach. ... Stanford promoted Mike Bloomgren to offensive coordinator.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.