Indiana becomes latest No. 1 to fall
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Indiana's latest run as No. 1 didn't last long, abruptly halted by a loss to unranked Illinois. Duke was bumped from the top spot twice in three weeks. Michigan and Louisville went one and done when their turns came.
It's not lonely at the top, it's getting crowded.
With the Hoosiers' expected tumble in the next poll, that'll be six straight weeks with a new No. 1, the second-longest streak since the first Associated Press poll in 1949.
The way things have gone this season, coaches might start lobbying voters to not put their teams atop the ballot.
“I do think there will be a revolving door or chairs that we will have a new No. 1 or new top fives moving forward because anyone can beat anyone,” Kansas coach Bill Self said Friday. “There is no dominant team, but there are a lot of really good ones.”
Oddly enough, this season of jumbling started with stability at the top.
Indiana was the preseason No. 1 and stayed there for the first five weeks before a 5-foot-11 walk-on from Butler knocked the Hoosiers from the top spot with a floater in overtime.
Duke got the bump to No. 1 after that and stayed in place for four polls until North Carolina State's fans stormed the court after a Blue Devil dumping Jan. 12 in Raleigh.
Since then, No. 1 teams have perched on a precarious pedestal.
After Duke's first loss, Louisville moved to No. 1. The Cardinals responded to prosperity with not just one loss but three in a row and tumbled out of the top 10 in two weeks.
The Blue Devils reclaimed the top spot in the Jan. 21 poll and promptly made Louisville's lapse forgettable with a 90-63 crushing by Miami, the third-worst loss ever by a No. 1.
Next up, Michigan. The Wolverines actually managed to win a game as No. 1, beating Northwestern. The downward pull of parity punched Michigan in its next game, a road loss to Indiana that sent the Hoosiers back to the top.
Indiana followed by getting caught up in the top-ranked turmoil in Champaign, inexplicably leaving Tyler Griffey open for an uncontested layup at the buzzer.
The current string of No. 1 swapping is the longest since 1994, when Arkansas, North Carolina, Kansas, UCLA and Duke alternated at the top seven straight weeks — the longest streak since Saint Louis debuted as No. 1 in the initial AP poll.
Top-ranked teams have lost six times this season overall, which isn't quite as rare; No. 1s lost nine times in 2008-09 and at least six times in a season since 1996-97, according to STATS Inc. The top-ranked team also has lost to an unranked team twice this season, which has happened 10 times in that span.
But it isn't just the teams at the top that are having trouble. Top 25 teams all over the country are getting knocked off by unranked opponents.
According to STATS, top 25 teams lost to unranked teams 36 times from Jan. 17 to Feb. 6, most in at least 17 years.
And some were ugly.
Indiana was firmly in control Thursday night before allowing Illinois, a team that had lost six of its previous seven games, to close with a 13-2 run to pull off the upset.
Florida would have been poised to take over the top spot but lost to unranked Arkansas by 11 a day after moving up to No. 2.
The Jayhawks were No. 2 two weeks ago, then lost to Oklahoma State at Allen Fieldhouse for the first time since 1989. Kansas followed that by scoring 13 points in the first half of a loss to TCU that had Self calling his team the worst Kansas had put on the floor since Dr. James Naismith invented the game.
With the latest jumbling, Michigan (20-2) could be the next No. 1. Or maybe Duke (19-2) gets another shot. Maybe someone new like Gonzaga (21-2) or Arizona (19-2) moves to the top.
Whoever gets there, no need to get comfortable. Chances are it won't last.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Michigan State defensive coordinator a Pitt coaching candidate
- Port Authority fires two bus drivers involved in rollover crash
- Pirates sign Corey Hart to 1-year deal
- LCB ruling could mean home-delivered beer in Pa.
- Steelers must be creative in providing snaps for linebackers
- Police gather in Ligonier for Perryopolis officer’s funeral
- Analysis: Misunderstood Chryst served Pitt well
- Giant Eagle Inc. appears to have settled ‘fuelperks!’ lawsuit
- Arbitration decides Westmoreland court workers’ pact
- Rossi: Brawl for ADs between Pitt and WVU
- Review: No improper contact between Pa. Supreme Court justices, lawyers