Despite losing players to cheating scandal, Harvard still in the rise
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, Feb. 22, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Jeremy Lin's jersey hangs in the lounge overlooking the Lavietes Pavilion, and dangling above Harvard's home court are the banners for the 2011 and ‘12 Ivy League championships.
And yet, to hear Tommy Amaker tell it, the school's best days are ahead.
“I think the building blocks are in our program now,” the Harvard coach said after practice this week. “We've built up some things. Maybe last year was a year of pushing it to the point of making the tournament, (but) I do think we have a program we can lean on and say: ‘There's something here in Harvard basketball.' ”
Despite a cheating scandal that cost them their senior co-captains, the Crimson were in first place in the Ivy League after completing their first trip through the conference last weekend with victories over Penn and Princeton. Harvard (15-7, 7-1) has games at Penn and Princeton remaining.
“We're in first place, so we're loving that,” Amaker said after practice this week. “But we also know that it's a long horse race.”
The program that tutored Lin has experienced unprecedented success in the past three years, sending him to the NBA in 2010, sharing the Ivy crown the next year and then winning it outright last year for its first NCAA tournament berth since 1946. Last year's team also set a Harvard record with 26 wins and reached The Associated Press Top 25 for the first time in school history.
And, with three of its top players returning, the Crimson were expected to win another conference title in 2013.
Then, in September, the school announced that it was investigating as many as 125 students in a single course for plagiarism on an open-book, take-home final exam. Although officials would not confirm who was involved, co-captains Kyle Casey and Brandyn Curry withdrew from school rather than endanger their final year of eligibility.
Amaker insisted that the losses would not devastate his team, saying they created an opportunity for others on the roster to inherit playing time and show they deserved it. There were other leaders who would replace the departed captains in the locker room, as well.
“We may not have what we had, but we have enough,” Amaker told his players.
“I believed it,” he said. “I think our kids, more importantly, believed it. They believed in us. We believed in them.”
The hastily retooled team lost its presumed status as the favorites to win the Ivy crown; Princeton was first in a preseason poll taken after the co-captains withdrew. But midway through the conference season, it's Harvard atop the league standings, thanks largely to a 69-57 victory over Princeton on Saturday that left the Tigers 1½ games back.
Among the keys to Harvard's success have been Webster, who with 85 wins in four years is now the winningest player in Harvard history, and guard Laurent Rivard, the leading scorer returning from last year's team. Sophomore Wesley Saunders is the leading scorer, with 16.7 points per game, followed by freshman Siyani Chambers (13 points per game), and forward Kenyatta Smith is averaging 1.8 blocks.
“We all know where we fit in,” Webster said. “That's what's made us successful.”
Harvard is on the road this weekend against Brown, a conference also-ran that went to double-overtime against the Crimson in Cambridge, and Yale. The following weekend is the crucial trip to Princeton and Penn; a victory in New Jersey could all-but clinch another Ivy title.
And, if not, Amaker will surely be confident again about next year, when Curry and Casey are expected to return and Chambers, who's emerging as one of the top freshmen in the conference, will have a year of experience.
“I know a lot of neat things occurred last year, but two and three years prior to last year, things have been getting to this point,” Amaker said. “I don't think it was just last year that was ‘The Year of Harvard basketball.'”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.