Share This Page

Highlands grad Micah Mason leaving Drake after 1 season

| Friday, March 15, 2013, 3:30 p.m.
Submitted
Micah Mason, a Highlands graduate, decided to leave Drake after one season.
Submitted
Micah Mason, a Highlands graduate, decided to leave Drake after one season.

Micah Mason wants to come home.

The former Highlands basketball standout was granted his release from Drake after one season and plans to transfer to a school closer to Pittsburgh.

“I would rather be around Pittsburgh; I want to come back,” Mason said. “I want to be somewhere closer than 15 hours away.”

Mason said his decision was made before Drake fired coach Mark Phelps on Thursday after a 15-17 season.

“That didn't have an impact at all,” Mason said. “I figured I was leaving no matter what.”

The transfer, Mason said, had more to do with his diet. He cannot ingest gluten, so he needs specially prepared meals. His mother, Karen, moved to Des Moines, Iowa, in September, to help out.

“She has been great,” Mason said. “She's in a house out here.”

The 6-foot-2 point guard, will have to sit out a season, per NCAA rules if he goes to another Division I school.

“I have no idea where I'll end up,” Mason said. “I will send my release papers to schools I am interested in. I will rely on God to help me through this.”

Mason, the WPIAL's all-time leader in 3-pointers made, played in 30 games as a freshman, averaging 5.4 points and 2.3 assists in 15.6 minutes per game.

Mason finished fourth in the nation in 3-point shooting, making 40 of 79 attempts (50.6 percent).

Bill Beckner Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at bbeckner@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.