Pols join fight to save wrestling as Olympic sport
DES MOINES, Iowa — Wrestling has brought together a group as unlikely to find common ground as Americans and Iranians: Republicans and Democrats.
All have become involved in trying to preserve wrestling as an Olympics sport since the International Olympic Committee recommended it be dropped after 2016. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) arrived at Wells Fargo Arena with a letter signed by Speaker of the House John Boehner and other Congressional leaders in support of wrestling.
“This is one of those issues where party lines aren't a problem,” Jordan, a former two-time NCAA champion, said Friday at news conference held by the Committee for the Preservation of Olympic Wrestling. “We're working together to protect this sport and make sure it stays an Olympic sport. People around the world know how special this sport is.”
Bipartisanship support and worldwide unity has American leaders of the sport confident that wrestling will remain in the Olympics beyond 2016. A final IOC vote on wrestling fate won't be taken until September.
“We've got to do the right thing,” said former legendary Iowa wrestler and coach Dan Gable, “and the right thing is to give people what they deserve.”
Jordan Burroughs said when he wrestled in a freestyle World Cup event in Iran in February he saw signs that said “Save Olympics wrestling” in English and Farsi, the predominant language in Iran.
“We've formed a camaraderie,” said Burroughs, a 2012 Olympic gold medalist. “Even though we're opponents on the mat, we've just definitely established a brotherhood, and we're going to try and reverse the decision the IOC has made.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.