Final Four notebook: Report: Pitino elected to Hall of Fame
• Louisville coach Rick Pitino was elected to the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame, according to multiple reports. The official announcement will be Monday in Atlanta. Pitino, 60, a finalist last year, could become the first coach to win NCAA national titles at two schools later that day. He also won at Kentucky in 1996. According to reports, former University of Houston coach Guy Lewis, former UNLV and Fresno State coach Jerry Tarkanian and NBA defensive specialist Gary Payton also were elected.
• As Hurricane Irene churned along the East Coast, flight after flight was getting canceled, andCleanthony Early remembers thinking to himself, “I'm stuck in Kansas.” The talented forward from upstate New York was on a recruiting visit to Wichita State. The first two days had gone well. Then he wound up stranded three more days and came away convinced. The rangy forward spurned overtures from Baylor, Alabama and Missouri to commit to coach Gregg Marshall. Three days, and one storm, ultimately changed the course of Early's life. The Shockers' basketball program, too.
• Louisville, a 10 1⁄2-point favorite, is the second biggest Final Four favorite since the field expanded to 64 teams in 1985. Only Duke, an 11-point pick over Michigan State in 1999, was a heavier favorite. Duke won, 68-62, before being upset by Connecticut in the finals. That was the last time a team entered the Final Four as the consensus choice and failed to win.
• Adidas has stopped selling T-shirts inspired by Louisville guard Kevin Ware's No. 5 because of a “use of logo issue.” Earlier this week, adidas was advertising shirts for $24.99 through Louisville's Web site that read “Ri5e To The Occasion.”
— Wire reports
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.