ShareThis Page

Penn State's defense to be tested by Indiana quarterback Richard Lagow

| Friday, Sept. 29, 2017, 6:42 p.m.
Indiana quarterback Richard Lagow threw for 292 yards and two touchdowns against Penn State last season.
Getty Images
Indiana quarterback Richard Lagow threw for 292 yards and two touchdowns against Penn State last season.

UNIVERSITY PARK –– Saquon Barkley jumped to the top of nearly every Heisman watch list when he tallied 358 all-purpose yards in Penn State's 21-19 win over Iowa last weekend.

Now, after his team inched past the Hawkeyes on a last-second touchdown, Barkley will look to lead the fourth-ranked Nittany Lions (4-0, 1-0 Big Ten) to a win over Indiana on Saturday at 3:30 p.m. at Beaver Stadium.

Facing the Hoosiers (2-1, 0-1), however, is no small task for the Nittany Lions, even after coach James Franklin's squad escaped a night game at Kinnick Stadium unscathed. During Penn State's nine-game winning streak that propelled it to a Big Ten championship and Rose Bowl berth, Indiana was the team that gave the Nittany Lions their biggest test.

In that contest, the Hoosiers led at the start of the fourth quarter before Penn State's offense went to work. Indiana quarterback Richard Lagow picked apart the Nittany Lions' secondary, completing 23 of 40 passes for 292 yards and two touchdowns.

Lagow, a 6-foot-6 senior, poses the same threat Saturday, and he'll have arguably his top weapon, Simmie Cobbs, back at receiver after a season-long injury in 2016.

“Offensively, comes down to their quarterback, Lagow,” Franklin said. “Big, strong, can really throw the ball into tight windows, very accurate. Simmie Cobbs, getting him back, obviously we all saw the Ohio State game to start the year and their chemistry and their connection together. That's going to be a challenge for us.”

Against the Buckeyes in Week 1, which the Hoosiers led at halftime before losing, Lagow and Cobbs connected 11 times for 149 yards and a touchdown.

Overall, Lagow completed 40 of his 65 attempts for 410 yards and three touchdowns.

The Nittany Lions' defense, though, has performed much better this year than it did in 2016. Through four games, coordinator Brent Pry's unit has the second-best scoring defense in FBS, giving up 8.3 points per game, including two shutouts.

The Nittany Lions lead the country in red zone defense, holding opponents to a touchdown and two field goals in six trips inside the 20. They also lead the FBS with 41 tackles for loss.

Part of the defense's success has come by forcing turnovers, which is something the unit worked on during the offseason. The Nittany Lions have forced 10 turnovers for an average of 2.5 per game. Last season, they totaled 21 turnovers, an average of 1.5 per game.

And the strong defense is helping the offense thrive as the Nittany Lions have scored 56 points off turnovers after their mark of 83 points off turnovers last season.

“We focused on (interceptions) during camp,” safety Troy Apke said. “During camp and during the first couple games, our biggest thing was to get at least three every practice.”

Matt Martell is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.