ShareThis Page

Penn State basketball routs Oral Roberts, improves to 6-1

| Friday, Nov. 24, 2017, 9:15 p.m.

UNIVERSITY PARK — Nazeer Bostick and Jamari Wheeler scored 14 points apiece, and Penn State beat Oral Roberts, 86-48, on Friday.

Tony Carr added 13 points, and Josh Reaves chipped in all 10 of his in the first half for the Nittany Lions (6-1), who remained hot at home with a 5-0 start and bounced back from an 11-point loss to No. 16 Texas A&M on Tuesday night in the Progressive Legends Classic championship game.

“I wanted to see how we responded, and I think they did a really good job,” Penn State coach Patrick Chambers said. “Leadership was there, discipline was there.”

Emmanuel Nzekwesi led the Golden Eagles (1-5) with 11 points, and Jontray Harris added nine.

Penn State never trailed and led 38-19 at halftime. The Nittany Lions built on that quickly, opening the second half with a 27-9 run for a 65-28 lead midway through the second half. Carr scored seven points, Garner made a pair of 3-pointers, and Mike Watkins ended the surge with a dunk — the third dunk during the stretch.

Penn State racked up 14 steals and forced 18 turnovers against Oral Roberts.

Jamari Wheeler had five steals and Josh Reaves had four against the Golden Eagles. The Nittany Lions entered the game third in the nation in total steals with 63.

Penn State travels to N.C. State on Wednesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.