2 more WPIAL products to 'run-on' at PSU
Penn State has added two more WPIAL products, as Franklin Regional linebacker Carter Henderson and Blackhawk running back Cole Chiappialle told coach Bill O'Brien that they plan to enroll as invited walk-ons.
They join North Allegheny receiver Gregg Garrity as “run-ons,” O'Brien's term for priority nonscholarship players.
Henderson told Penn State coaches Friday that he was accepting the offer to join the team as an invited walk-on. Chiappialle committed to Penn State earlier this week.
Chiappialle and Henderson received interest from smaller Division I school and Division II powers.
Henderson set a school record with 145 tackles last season, while Chiappialle had more than 2,000 rushing and receiving yards combined in 2012. The 5-foot-11, 200-pound running back ran for 1,494 yards and 23 touchdowns and caught 49 passes for 522 yards.
The two as well as Garrity, son of former PSU and Steelers receiver Gregg Garrity, were among 25 players Penn State pursued as invited walk-ons.
The school has a rich tradition with walk-ons — Garrity's father made a diving touchdown catch in the 1983 Sugar Bowl that helped deliver Penn State's first national championship — and it will lean on such players more than ever as it weathers NCAA sanctions.
Penn State, per sanctions, is allowed to offer only 15 scholarships a year for the next four years (the maximum for schools not on probation is 25). It has 17 recruits for its 2013 class, though five of them have enrolled early and will count toward the 2012 class.
Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @ScottBrown_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.