ShareThis Page

Penn State rides Big Ten title momentum into NCAAs

| Sunday, March 10, 2013, 7:06 p.m.

Penn State will take momentum along with its status as defending champion into the NCAA Wrestling Championships later this month.

The Nittany Lions, powered by a lineup that is loaded on the back end, won four individual titles and a third consecutive Big Ten team championship this weekend in Champaign, Ill.

Ed Ruth led a parade of winners as he captured a third straight Big Ten title with a 5-3 win over Minnesota's Kevin Steinhaus on Sunday in the 184-pound bout.

Ruth improved to 28-0 this season, and the senior and Cael Sanderson were named the Big Ten's wrestler and coach of the year, respectively, after Penn State scored 151 points to roar past Minnesota (139) and Iowa (133.5).

Joining Ruth, a defending national champion, atop the award stand were David Taylor (165), Matt Brown (174) and Quentin Williams (197). Nico Megaludis took third at 125 pounds; the Franklin Regional graduate lost in the semifinals to Illinois' Jesse Delgado before rebounding with a pair of victories.

Delgado beat Iowa's Matt McDonough, the defending national champion at 125 pounds, in the championship match on the way to tournament Most Outstanding Wrestler honors.

The Nittany Lions will try to claim a third consecutive national championship March 21-23, and they will be represented in all 10 weight classes in Des Moines, Iowa.

Taylor and Ruth became Penn State's third and fourth three-time Big Ten champions.

Wright, like Ruth, takes a perfect record (27-0) to the NCAA Championships. A loss to Pitt's Matt Wilps in a dual meet earlier this season did not count against his record.

Taylor, like, Ruth, will try to win a second consecutive national championship later this month.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.