Penn State notebook: Howle, Gress fill openings on offensive line
Penn State's quarterback situation is still wide open with a week left in spring practice.
The Nittany Lions appear to be set regarding who will block next fall for their quarterback — Steven Bench, Tyler Ferguson or incoming freshman Christian Hackenberg.
Center Ty Howle and right tackle Adam Gress have filled the openings left by the graduation of Matt Stankiewitch and Mike Farrell. Howle in particular has impressed right guard John Urschel, a returning first-team All-Big Ten pick.
“I can talk about Ty all day,” Urschel said Thursday during a Big Ten conference call. “He's one of the most underrated players on our team. I don't think we're going to miss a beat at that position.”
That is high praise considering Stankiewitch earned first-team All-Big Ten honors last season and will get a chance to play in the NFL.
Howle, Gress and Urschel are classmates, and the fifth-year seniors and will line up together in the Blue-White game April 20. They are slated to join left tackle Donovan Smith, a redshirt sophomore, and left guard Miles Dieffenbach, a redshirt junior, in the starting lineup next fall.
Redshirt junior guard/center Angelo Mangiro and fifth-year senior tackle Eric Shrive have also worked with the first-team offense during spring drills and likely will open next season as the top reserves along the offensive line.
Better safe than sorry
It wasn't hard for coach Bill O'Brien to settle on Glenn Carson, Mike Hull and Nyeem Wartman as his starting linebackers.
Keeping the three healthy for most or all of the 2013 season may prove to be a different matter.
The second-year coach has limited contact during spring practice due to concerns about depth at positions such as linebacker and the reality that Penn State will play with scholarship restrictions in 2013 because of NCAA sanctions.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.