Share This Page

Penn State lands 3-star running back/defensive back

| Friday, May 3, 2013, 1:33 p.m.

Penn State picked up its seventh verbal commitment for 2014 on Friday when running back/defensive back Daquan Worley picked the Nittany Lions over Rutgers.

The 5-foot-10, 170-pound Worley is a three-star recruit, according to Rivals.com.

He rushed for 1,779 yards and 20 touchdowns as a junior at Coatesville High School near Philadelphia. He also intercepted three passes and had 45 tackles last season.

The Nittany Lions recruited Worley as a cornerback.

Penn State's 2014 recruiting class is rapidly filling up. It's received verbal commitments from three wide receivers, including Mt. Lebanon's Troy Apke; two running backs; and a linebacker.

Players are not allowed to make binding commitments until national signing day Feb. 5.

Aliquippa defensive back Dravon Henry, Mt. Lebanon offensive lineman Alex Bookser and Gateway defensive backs Montae Nicholson and Anthony Davis are among the local players to whom Penn State has offered scholarships.

The Nittany Lions also have offered Washington running back Shai McKenzie and are interested in Thomas Jefferson linebacker Chase Winovich and Bethel Park offensive lineman Mike Grimm.

Penn State isn't allowed to sign more than 15 players to its 2014 class because of NCAA sanctions. The Nittany Lions may sign less than that since they have to be down to 65 scholarship players by Sept. 1, per the NCAA sanctions.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.