PSU hockey coach wants NHL Winter Classic
Penn State men's hockey coach Guy Gadowsky would love to see fans pack Beaver Stadium for something besides football.
Gadowsky said Penn State's football stadium would be an ideal place to hold the NHL Winter Classic and pit cross-state rivals like the Penguins and Flyers against one another.
“I think it would be fantastic,” Gadowsky said Thursday.
The central location of Penn State to Pittsburgh and Philadelphia makes Beaver Stadium an attractive location, he said.
Gadowsky has more immediate concerns, however, as he is ushering Penn State hockey into major-college competition. The Nittany Lions will play 20 Big Ten games this season, and they will also skate in a new area. The Pegula Ice Center is scheduled to open in September, and Penn State will christen the new building with an Oct. 11 game against Army.
Penn State played a limited Big Ten conference schedule last season and went a respectable 13-14. It upset perennial powerhouses Michigan State, Ohio State and Wisconsin.
“I was shocked that we were able to have some of the success we had,” Gadowsky said. “Those wins were huge for our program.”
Penn State will play in Consol Energy Center again this season, Gadowsky said, after taking part in the Three Rivers Classic in December.
Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @ScottBrown_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.