Penn State hopes to change Central QB's mind
Penn State received two more verbal commitments Friday and set its sights on a WPIAL quarterback during a busy day on the recruiting front.
Maryland defensive back Marcus Allen and Michigan linebacker Jared Wangler pledged to play at Penn State. The Nittany Lions, meanwhile, offered a scholarship to Central Catholic's J.J. Cosentino.
Cosentino already has given a verbal commitment to Florida State, but Penn State is looking to sign a quarterback in 2014 since Steven Bench transferred.
Cosentino threw for just 552 yards and three touchdowns as a junior, but the 6-foot-4, 216-pounder missed the early part of the season while coming back from a torn ACL. Cosentino has a strong arm and has run the 40-yard dash in 4.7 seconds, giving him the kind of measurables schools covet.
Penn State is recruiting a handful of WPIAL players, including Aliquippa defensive back Dravon Henry and Mt. Lebanon lineman Alex Bookser.
Penn State's 2014 class — recruits are not allowed to sign until February — is filling up.
The Nittany Lions already have commitments from three receivers — including Mt. Lebanon's Troy Apke — two running backs, two linebackers and two defensive backs.
Penn State is not allowed to sign more than 15 players in 2014 because of NCAA sanctions.
Allen, a safety, picked Penn State over numerous suitors, including Michigan, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Clemson and Pitt. The 6-foot-2, 190-pounder had 69 tackles and two interceptions as a junior for Henry Wise High School in Upper Marlboro, Md.
Wangler, an outside linebacker, picked Penn State over Michigan State.
The 6-foot-2, 215-pounder had 76 tackles and seven sacks as a junior for De La Salle High School in Warren, Mich.
Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @ ScottBrown_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.