Penn State notebook: Former recruit arrested for second time
Zayd Issah likely squandered the second chance that Penn State coach Bill O'Brien appeared ready to give the former Central Dauphin High standout.
Issah is in trouble with the law again after he was charged with aggravated assault, three counts of resisting arrest and possession of marijuana following his arrest Saturday morning at a State College apartment.
Issah is being held in Centre County Jail, and a preliminary hearing is set for Wednesday.
The three-star recruit, according to Rivals.com, signed with Penn State last February, and the Harrisburg-area linebacker was one of the Nittany Lions' more coveted prospects.
O'Brien pulled Issah's scholarship after he was arrested in March for trying to use counterfeit money at several McDonald's restaurants.
Issah was diverted in an ARD program, and he planned to attend prep school with the hopes of enrolling at Penn State next January provided he stayed out of trouble.
Football charity raises more than $133,000
Penn State established a new record by raising a little more than $133,000 through Lift For Life, a football player-run charity that benefits the Kidney Cancer Association.
The money raised as of noon Saturday tops the $119,707 that the fundraiser generated in 2012.
Lift For Life was started in 2003, and it has raised $825,000.
“Lift For Life has become a great tradition where Penn State football and our fans are able to raise more than $100,000 annually for kidney cancer patients and research,” said fifth-year senior offensive tackle Eric Shrive, president of Penn State's Uplifting Athletes Chapter. “I couldn't be prouder to be a part of such a great tradition.”
Fans can still make a “Lift For Life” donation by visiting the Penn State Uplifting Athletes donation page at liftforlife.upliftingathletes.org/lf12/.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.