Penn State secures 4-star recruits
Ten days after 2014's signing day, Penn State's new coaching staff began assembling its Class of 2015.
Three players made verbal commitments to the Nittany Lions during the program's first “junior day” under James Franklin: offensive tackle Ryan Bates, defensive end Kamonte Carter and safety Jarvis Miller.
Bates of Archbishop Wood High in Warminster and Carter of Gaithersburg, Md., are rated as four-star recruits by Rivals.com.
The 6-foot-5, 285-pound Bates sits is ranked as the No. 4 recruit in Pennsylvania by Rivals.com — the first fruits of Franklin's claims to “dominate the state.” Bates is No. 184 nationally (No. 22 tackle). Carter also is in the top 250.
At 6-4, 230 pounds, Carter has been termed an “athlete” by some recruiting services. He has played numerous positions, including quarterback.
Franklin said in announcing the 2014 class last week that offensive tackle had been identified as the Nittany Lions' greatest area of need. The second-biggest need? Safety. Two-star Connecticut native Miller, at 6-2 and 185 pounds, brings the size and length Penn State's coaches covet.
According to Rivals, Bates has offers from 15 major-conference schools (including Ohio State, Auburn and Pitt), and Carter had 10 (including West Virginia and Pitt).
About three dozen prospects were expected to visit University Park on Saturday. While it's early for high school juniors to commit, it's not uncommon. PSU's biggest rivals in the Big Ten East division — Ohio State and Michigan — also have two four-star verbal recruits, according to Rivals.
“The Big Ten has gotten better and stronger with the addition of James Franklin,” Rivals.com national recruiting analyst Mike Farrell said. “It'll be fun to watch Franklin, (Michigan coach Brady) Hoke and (Ohio State coach) Urban Meyer going at it.”
Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.