4-star RB recruit commits to Penn State
Six weeks after proclaiming Penn State would “dominate the state” in recruiting, James Franklin and the Nittany Lions' new coaching staff have begun to show it.
Running back Saquon Barkley from Whitehall near Allentown gave a verbal commitment to Penn State on Wednesday. Barkley, a junior rated as a four-star prospect by Rivals.com for the Class of 2015, flipped his commitment from Rutgers.
The 5-foot-11, 190-pound Barkley is ranked among the top 200 players in the country for his graduating class by Rivals.com. He becomes the fourth Lions' commitment among current high school juniors and the second from Pennsylvania.
Offensive tackle Ryan Bates of Archbishop Wood High in Warminster was one of three to commit to Penn State on Saturday — PSU's “junior day” on campus. Bates and Barkley are considered among the top 10 of Pennsylvania's Rivals.com-rated 2015 class. Penn State had none of the state's top 10 players in the 2014 class signed two weeks ago.
Three of Penn State's four 2015 commitments are Rivals' four-star rated.
Among other reported scholarship offers Barkley held was one from Pitt. He originally committed to Rutgers in September but reports linked him to interest to Penn State even prior to the resignation of Bill O'Brien in late December.
On his Twitter account Wednesday, Barkey tweeted “#WeAre #107kstrong” and “I wanna thank RU and their coaches for all the support.”
Three running backs signed national letters of intent for the coming season Feb. 5. They join rising seniors Bill Belton and Zach Zwinak and sophomore Akeel Lynch as players at the position who have been on scholarship throughout their PSU careers.
Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.