Penn State's Conlan gets College Football Hall of Fame nod
Shane Conlan received word earlier this year he had been nominated for induction into the College Football Hall of Fame.
“I didn't think I had a chance, though,” the former Penn State star linebacker said. “They explained how it's the hardest of all the halls of fame to get into — just .002 percent of players.”
The 1986 All-American was one of 14 former players who joined two coaches as those announced for enshrinement Thursday.
“I was a zero-star recruit coming out of high school, so I owe (former PSU defensive coordinator) Tom Bradley and (former PSU coach) Joe Paterno, along with my high school coach,” Conlan said in a phone interview from Dallas, where the announcement of the class was made. “I didn't really get recruited by anybody, and those guys found me.”
Conlan, who lives in Sewickley, is vice president of corporate partnerships with the Power. A captain on the 1986 national champion Nittany Lions, Conlan fought back tears when he addressed media at the announcement.
Joining Conlan for December induction ceremonies will be former Alabama linebacker Derrick Thomas, TCU running back LaDainian Tomlinson, South Carolina receiver Sterling Sharpe, USC tackle Tony Boselli, Georgia Tech quarterback Joe Hamilton, Louisiana Tech tackle Willie Roaf, North Carolina cornerback Dre Bly, Purdue defensive tackle Dave Butz, Maine linebacker John Huard, Stanford running back Darrin Nelson, UCLA quarterback John Sciarra, McNeese State defensive back Leonard Smith and Mississippi tight end Wesley Walls. Mike Bellotti (Oregon) and Jerry Moore (North Texas, Texas Tech and Appalachian State) were coaches chosen.
The Associated Press contributed. Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.