Penn State adds cornerback recruit
Penn State picked up another recruit for its 2015 class on Sunday morning when consensus three-star prospect Myles Hartsfield made a verbal commitment to the Nittany Lions prior to participating in a camp on the University Park campus.
The 5-foot-10, 180-pound Hartsfield, from Sayreville HS in Parlin, N.J., is projected as a cornerback for Penn State. According to Rivals.com, Hartsfield had scholarship offers from, among others, Pitt, West Virginia, Purdue, Rutgers and Syracuse.
The speedy Hartsfield (timed in the 4.4-second range in the 40-yard dash at the Penn State camp Sunday) is the 16th member of PSU's 2015 recruiting class, which is ranked No. 3 nationally by Rivals.com. He's also the third defensive back in the class.
The new James Franklin coaching staff has talked repeatedly about wanting a fast defense.
Hartsfield is the fourth 2015 commitment from New Jersey. All four are ranked by Rivals as among the state's top 10 prospects in the class — new Big Ten rival Rutgers, located in New Jersey, has no verbal commitments from a top-10 in-state recruit.
Only Alabama and Clemson have more 2015 verbal commitments at this point than Penn State's 16. The Nittany Lions are limited to a class of 20 incoming prospects in 2015, now the final season of such restrictions due to NCAA sanctions. However, PSU might not be able to secure that many come national signing day in February because 2015 is also the final season its roster is limited in scholarships (to 80 instead of the regular 85).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.