Share This Page

Penn State looks for cornerbacks Williams, Davis to bounce back this season

| Friday, Aug. 15, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

Trevor Williams had the game-clinching interception in Penn State's 2013 opener against Syracuse but lost his starting job by the season's midway point.

Da'Quan Davis was a regular contributor on defense as a true freshman in 2012 but rarely saw the field outside of special teams in 2013.

With the 2014 opener two weeks away, Williams and Davis have reclaimed their prominent spots among Penn State's cornerback hierarchy under the Nittany Lions' new coaching staff.

“We've assured the guys a clean slate,” defensive coordinator Bob Shoop said. “These are two guys who have taken full advantage of that.”

Cornerbacks coach Terry Smith said the 6-foot-1, 188-pound Williams “has had the best offseason of anyone on the team.” Shoop concurred.

Shoop speculated Davis “probably got in the previous staff's doghouse” but said he has “practiced extremely well.” Shoop noted Davis “really stood out” in the spring game while on a roster (the “White” team) that meant he was defending mostly starters (on the “Blue” team).

At only 171 pounds, the 5-10 Davis gives up 25 pounds to Penn State starting boundary corner Jordan Lucas, who earned preseason All-Big Ten recognition after seizing a starting job in 2013 upon moving from safety.

Lucas broke out and became a reliable, productive player and team leader — if not a star.

The cornerback opposite him remains as perhaps the one spot among the starting 11 that is a question mark for the defense. Williams held the No. 1 job there until the seventh game of last season, when the former coaching staff moved Adrian Amos from safety back to replace him.

Not long after coming to Penn State in January, Shoop — wowed by what he saw on tape from Amos — declared Amos a safety once again. That leaves Williams as the “incumbent” for a job he won at the beginning of last year but ultimately lost.

“He's worked extremely hard and has been a guy committed and dedicated to being the best he can,” Smith said.

Three years ago, Williams was a three-star recruit from Maryland as a wide receiver. He had 10 catches and one start as a true freshman in 2012. But in part to address a team need, he was moved to defense during 2013 spring practice.

Shoop believes it took a full year for Williams to feel completely comfortable with it.

“It all clicked in for him about mid-spring, and he's embraced being a corner,” Shoop said. “Where I think he did it for the team at one point, now he's embraced it: ‘I'm doing this. This is not just some part-time thing. I'm really a corner now, and I'm ready to take my game to the next level.' ”

Should Penn State fail to get steady play from Williams or Davis this season, there are virtually no other known quantities at cornerback. Jordan Smith worked into the rotation as a true freshman in 2013, and the defensive staff is excited about four incoming freshmen at the position: Grant Haley, Christian Campbell, Amani Oruwariye and Daquan Worley.

At least some of those freshmen will play this season. How much likely depends on how big of a bounce-back the Lions get from Williams and Davis.

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.