ShareThis Page

Penn State, WVU ranked in Amway Coaches preseason poll

| Thursday, Aug. 3, 2017, 3:24 p.m.
Penn State NCAA college football head coach James Franklin speaks at Big Ten Media Day in Chicago, Monday, July 24, 2017. (AP Photo/G-Jun Yam)
Penn State NCAA college football head coach James Franklin speaks at Big Ten Media Day in Chicago, Monday, July 24, 2017. (AP Photo/G-Jun Yam)

Defending Big Ten champion Penn State and West Virginia were ranked Nos. 6 and 20, respectively, in the Amway Coaches preseason poll released Thursday.

Pitt received 45 voting points and is ranked 32nd.

Pitt was the first ACC team ranked after the top five: No. 3 Florida State, No. 5 Clemson, No. 17 Louisville, No. 18 Miami and No. 22 Virginia Tech. The Panthers will play four of the top 22, including Penn State, No. 11 Oklahoma State, Miami and Virginia Tech.

Overall, 10 of the 14 ACC teams received votes, with N.C. State at No. 33, Georgia Tech tied for 42nd, North Carolina at No. 48 and Syracuse at No. 54.

The SEC had the most teams (six) ranked in the top 25, but only one — No. 1 Alabama — in the top 10. Alabama received 49 of 65 first-place votes.

The Big Ten had only four teams in the top 25, but all were in the top 10 (No. 2 Ohio State, Penn State, No. 9 Michigan and No. 10 Wisconsin).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.