ShareThis Page

Versatile offensive line gives Pitt plenty of options

Jerry DiPaola
| Wednesday, Aug. 23, 2017, 8:27 p.m.
Pitt offensvie lineman Brandon Hodges during practice Aug. 2017 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt offensvie lineman Brandon Hodges during practice Aug. 2017 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Pitt offensvie lineman Brandon Hodges during practice Aug. 2017 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt offensvie lineman Brandon Hodges during practice Aug. 2017 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

First, he grimaced. Clearly, the question didn't please him.

Then, he smiled (but only slightly). When a reporter asked coach Pat Narduzzi on Wednesday about the details of the puzzle that has become the Pitt offensive line, he had no interest in sweeping away the fog.

Is he close to naming the five starters for the opener Sept. 2 against Youngstown State.

"Maybe. I don't know," he said.

"Do you have a sense?"

"We have a sense."

For now, that will have to do.

Narduzzi protects such secrets like a bank guard watches his vault, but the problem is a good one to have.

There's depth on the offensive line, and players are getting cross-trained at multiple positions.

"Everybody's usable; everybody's versatile," guard/tackle Brandon Hodges said.

With so many options, Narduzzi can keep the mystery alive, which presumably will make it more difficult for Youngstown State to prepare. At least, that's what all coaches say.

Of course, after that game, the mystery ends. ESPN will take the lens caps off its cameras, and Pitt's five starters will be revealed.

Until then, there are questions.

• Where will Brandon Hodges line up after starting nine games at tackle for Texas last season. Guard? Tackle? "50-50," Narduzzi said.

• Who's going to win the battle at center? The team's newest scholarship player, redshirt freshman and former walkon Jimmy Morrissey, who got the good news Wednesday on the practice field?

• Or, junior Connor Dintino, who played in 11 games last season and has been competing for the starting job since winter workouts? • Or, will Narduzzi and line coach John Peterson merely decide to move senior Alex Officer there from left guard. After all, he has started 23 games at center. Officer has been lining up at left guard through most of training camp, but he said, "I've been taking center snaps to make sure it's fresh in my mind."

• Or, will Alex Bookser move to center after he serves his one-game suspension in the opener? That's one mystery that may not be cleared up until Pitt visits Penn State on Sept. 9.

Recruiting Hodges as a graduate transfer was probably Pitt's most important personnel move of the off-season. He can play guard and tackle, which allows for plenty of options. Hodges said he's at right guard "right now," which would allow Bookser, the incumbent right guard, to play center (if that's even Peterson's top plan). If Hodges moves to tackle, what happens to Jaryd Jones-Smith? Does he move to left tackle until All-ACC tackle Brian O'Neill is completely healthy after an offseason shoulder injury? Narduzzi has said O'Neill will be ready for Youngstown State, but is it worth stressing the shoulder against an FCS team that Pitt should beat easily?

Resting its best players might be a risky move for Pitt against Youngstown State, the FCS runner-up from a year ago that outscored the Panthers, 68-62, in their past two meetings.

Hodges said he's ready for anything.

"Learning fast has always been one of the things I was good at," he said. "I take pride in it." He said her has been studying both positions "in the film room, late nights, even before I go to bed.

"You have to be ready for anything."

Which does he prefer? "It doesn't even matter," he said.

Now, there's a player who has been well-schooled by his coach.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.