ShareThis Page
Pitt

Pitt softball shuts out North Carolina, reaches ACC championship game

Jerry DiPaola
| Saturday, May 12, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Pitt softball advanced to the title game of the ACC Tournament for the second time in four years, recording a 3-0 semifinal victory Friday against North Carolina at Mewborn Field in Atlanta.

No. 2 seed Pitt (33-17-1) will meet top-seeded Florida State (46-10 and ranked 10th in the nation by USA Today) at noon Saturday on ESPN. The Panthers also played Florida State in the 2015 championship game, losing, 6-2.

A victory would give Pitt its only ACC tournament championsihp in any sport since joining the conference for the 2013-2014 academic year.

“We can't wait for (Saturday),” Pitt coach Holly Aprile said.

Starting pitcher Sarah Dawson threw her first complete game shutout of the season at the most opportune time. She allowed two hits and two walks and let her defense make the plays behind her, striking out only one batter.

“Sarah was tremendous today,” Aprile said. “She got in a few jams early in first two innings, but battled right through that.

“She made adjustments up and down the lineup. It's a really potent lineup to pitch to since they have many different things happening with their slappers and power hitters. She just did a great job.”

Pitt scored on junior Taylor Myers' two-run single and Erin Hershman's double down the right field line.

“All year we have tried to make things happen on the bases and at the plate,” Aprile said. “Taylor came through with the big hit and it worked out nicely.

“Erin's at-bat was huge. She was able to sneak her bat out at that pitch and pull it around, placing it in the perfect position for us to be able to score that insurance run.”Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me