Clairton's Howard picks Pitt
Clairton cornerback Titus Howard on Sunday became the fourth WPIAL player and eighth from the Class of 2013 to make a verbal commitment to Pitt.
Now, the Panthers hope Howard can persuade teammate Tyler Boyd, a four-star wide receiver who participated in the Rivals.com tournament this weekend in Atlanta.
“I am going to try to get him there,” Howard said.
Howard, 6-foot-3 and 180 pounds, was on campus with many of his teammates, helping Clairton win a championship at Pitt's seven-on-seven camp.
Clairton defeated Thomas Jefferson, 25-20, in the title game.
Howard said he considered waiting until after the season to make a decision.
“But it felt right today, and I ended up doing it,” he said. “I like their program. I love being around the coaches. Coach (Paul) Chryst was really excited. He said he can't wait.”
Howard, rated a two-star recruit by Rivals, had scholarship offers from Temple, Rutgers, Connecticut, Toledo, Akron, Arkansas State and Youngstown State. Locally, Pitt also has commitments from South Fayette receiver Zach Challingsworth and tight ends Scott Orndoff of Seton-La Salle and Jaymar Parrish of Gateway.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-320-7997.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.