Pitt's Taglianetti: Chryst changes atmosphere
• A year ago when Pitt opened football practice, players were excited to work with new coach Todd Graham, but not many were relieved that Dave Wannstedt was gone. Under new coach Paul Chryst, the atmosphere is different, fifth-year senior safety Andrew Taglianetti said. “It's more fun,” he said. “The culture has changed so much. We are not worried about how Coach Graham is going to view us as people and judge us as people.” Taglianetti said Graham's hype might have set up unreasonable expectations. “He was trying to paint this portrait of him being the ultimate man, and we (were) trying to do that, too. You had to watch everything.” Chryst trusts his players more than Graham did, Taglianetti said. “We come here to do our work and that's to play football, and I think coach Chryst gets that. It's up to us to live the right way off the field.”
• Junior Tyrone Ezell, who has mainly played tackle, lined up at left defensive end in an attempt to add more experience to the line. “He is a talented player,” Chryst said. “He has to get comfortable with what we are asking him to do so he can turn it loose. He is big (6-foot-4, 300 pounds) and certainly athletic enough. It will be fun to see in camp how he progresses, if (end) is truly a good fit for him.”
• Redshirt sophomore offensive tackle Tom Ricketts missed much of practice with what Chryst described as an “upper-body” injury. Ricketts, who is eligible for the first time after transferring from Penn State last year, had an ice pack strapped to his right shoulder.
• Running back Ray Graham, who is recovering from knee surgery, did almost everything, with the exception of the more physical 11-on-11 drills. But he said he felt good and plans to be ready for the opener Sept. 1.
— Jerry DiPaola
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.