Share This Page

Pitt notebook: Former football coach Graham criticizes school

| Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2012, 8:54 p.m.
Arizona State football coach Todd Graham (left) talks with Alden Darby during practice April 17, 2012, in Tempe, Ariz. (AP)

• Former Pitt coach Todd Graham criticized the university Wednesday, claiming issues with people "unhappy with things in the administration" helped lead to his departure to Arizona State. Graham, who said coaching the team was "a struggle," made the remarks in a seven-part series entitled, "In My Own Words - Todd Graham." The program appears on FOXsportsArizona.com and will air on TV in Arizona beginning Aug. 25. "There are a lot more problems there than just me," he said. "I wasn't comfortable in the area recruiting. I made a bad decision. When I got there, I didn't realize the issues that were there." He did not elaborate. Asked to respond, Pitt senior associate athletic director/media relations E.J. Borghetti said, "Todd Graham's credibility problems are well documented. Further comment on that subject would be simply piling on."

• Pitt lost another offensive lineman. Coach Paul Chryst said redshirt sophomore tackle Tom Ricketts, who played at North Allegheny, will have season-ending surgery on his right shoulder. Ricketts, who was eligible this season for the first time after transferring from Penn State, injured the shoulder on the first day of practice Monday. Freshman Adam Bisnowaty of Fox Chapel is now the No. 1 backup at offensive left tackle.

• Running back Ray Graham, outside linebacker Todd Thomas and freshman receiver Demitrious Davis were given the day off to rest injuries. Speaking of Graham, who ran well Tuesday and did not suffer a setback in his recovery from knee surgery, Chryst said, "This is a process that is long. You have a guy who is just coming out. We are going to be smart in how we approach this thing."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.